Once received, submissions are first registered and screened by our staff for eligibility and completeness.
Submissions are then pre-screened by a small team of staff and Jury members to evaluate their fit and relevancy to Prize themes. Those submissions that clear the pre-screening stage are then delivered as qualified submissions to the respective AMP Jury for their evaluation.
The Jury will review and grade the qualified submissions using the following three main criteria: Artistic Merit, Technical Merit and Thematic Fit. These criteria are separately weighted based on their level of importance to arrive at a score out of 100 for each evaluated submission.
In the case of the two commissioning prizes, the Jury will also apply a fourth unscored criteria (Capacity), which is important to their deliberations in selecting the best candidate to win each Prize.
Artistic Merit (70 points)
This is the most important criteria the Jury applies in evaluating each submission. It is directly tied to the composer’s proven ability to write original concert music of high artistic merit.
The Jury will determine:
- the level of creativity displayed in the conceptual, formal/structural and musical ideas of each qualified submission;
- the ability of the submitted musical examples to sustain a listener’s attention over their entire length;
- the level of authenticity and distinctiveness displayed in the composer’s artistic voice;
- the composer’s ability to work successfully within the complex format of chamber music for large forces (i.e. up to 16 musicians); and
- the composer’s capacity to generate high quality, original and professional musical material based on the AMP guidelines for instrumentation and duration.
Technical Merit (20 points)
The Jury will evaluate each qualified submission with the aim of identifying how well thought-out it is in regards to its use of rhythm, melody, harmony, timbre, texture, dynamics and orchestration. They will evaluate these elements especially in regards to how well they express or positively reinforce the composer’s purpose and intentions for the proposed or submitted work, and as they relate to the objectives of the Azrieli Music Prizes.
Thematic Fit (10 points)
The Jury will evaluate whether the qualified submission offers a topical and original fit to the objectives of the Azrieli Music Prizes based on the approved guidelines of what can constitute Jewish music.
The Jury will evaluate the qualified submissions for the candidates’ ability to execute the project as proposed.
Given the circumstances of requesting a commission and its premiere performance, can the proposal be realistically ans successfully achieved? Does the composer demonstrate enough previous experience to assure the Jury that they will delivery on their proposal n the time allotted and with high artistic and technical merit? Those proposals for which the Jury can answer these questions in the affirmative will advance in the competition.